History Is Made At Night posts a newspaper cutting that shows that "raver" and "ravers" was well established as the term for marauding mobs of hard-partying, up-all-night youngsters in the UK by the late 1950s
Here's the text, again heisted from History Is Made At Night:
40 coffee bar night spots- some of them dimly lit cellars were teenagers go on unlimited necking parties - have earned for the seaside town of Brighton this new title… It's ravers' top town.
The "ravers" are gangs of young people who travel from London on early morning milk trains to have a rave day and night whooping it up in the coffee bars.
Why ravers? Because they move around in a crowd not caring where, not caring why...
The dingy ill-ventilated coffee bars have one piece of equipment common to all. The juke box. To the canned music the teenage ravers jive themselves into a frenzy. As they jive they kiss. When they tire they lounge around often on the floor because there aren't enough seats.
And the necking goes on continuously. In London coffee bars necking is strictly forbidden. But no such prudery in Brighton. There the ravers can neck from 11:30 am to 11:30 pm and no one will tell them to calm it down.
When they have enough of one bar the rave starts up again and they move to the next spot. Often the ravers carry their own musical instruments and jive in the streets.
They are not popular with the Brighton police who will be keeping a special watch for them on bank holiday trains this weekend. Not long ago a trainload of ravers paraded to through Brighton streets at dawn, singing, jiving and waking sleeping people
(Sunday Pictorial, 29 March 1959)
The last line about "singing, jiving and waking sleeping people" reminded me of this '93 classic that hijacks Aled Jones: "we're walking in the air.... while people far below are sleeping as we fly". E makes of us angels...
2 comments:
And of course Bowie, steeped in both youth culture and the mainstream media, slips in a reference to "a crash course for the ravers" in Drive-In Saturday in 1973.
Did anyone ever use that for a hardcore track, I wonder?
That's a great point - and probably then it's a slightly quaint, arch term - from the previous decade. And in the context of the song, it has the sexual connotation.
Post a Comment