Saturday, November 22, 2025

Dance Literature: Joost an illusion?

I have long delighted in this 1957 quote from Dr. Joost A.M. Meerloo - what a name! - on the subject of rock and roll and dance mania. Don't think I was able to deploy it in Energy Flash itself but it got included in my Rave Theory Toolkit:

"Why are rhythmical sounds and motions so especially contagious? A rhythmical call to the crowd easily foments mass ecstasy: 'Duce! Duce! Duce!" The call repeats itself into the infinite, and liberates the mind of all reasonable inhibitions -  as in drug addiction, a thousand years of civilization fall away in a moment.... Rock 'n' roll is a sign of depersonalization of the individual, of ecstatic veneration of mental decline and passivity. If we cannot stem the tide with its waves of rhythmic narcosis and of future waves of vicarious craze, we are preparing our own downfall in the midst of pandemic funeral dances. The dance craze is the infantile rage and outlet of our actual world." 

Although written in flowery and windy style, this grave warning is fairly typical of the scaremongering reactions to dance crazes associated with youth music (meaning in fact black music made for all ages that suddenly connects with young white people). This discourse about the degrading and de-civilizing effects of rhythm erupted around rock'n'roll ("jungle music", leads to sex before marriage and venereal disease, etc c). But they are very similar to the frightened responses to jazz  from the elder-and-squarer generation when the hot sound first seethed out of the disreputable quarters of New Orleans to conquer America and the world. Very similar analogies or connections were made to narcotic drugs, loosening of sexual inhibition, coke-crazed flappers etc.  

And very similar accusations were made about acid house by the UK tabloids. 

Read the whole Feb. 23, 1957 article in New York Times in which the Joost quote appeared and the hysterical tone is something else: 

EXPERTS PROPOSE STUDY OF 'CRAZE'; Liken It to Medieval Lunacy, 'Contagious Dance Furies' and Bite of Tarantula

Psychologists suggested yesterday that while the rock 'n' roll craze seemed to be related to “rhythmic behavior patterns” as old as the Middle Ages, it required fullstudy as a current phenomenon. One educational psychologist asserted that what happened in and around the Paramount Theatre yesterday struck him as "very much like the medieval type of spontaneous lunacy where one person goes off and lots of other persons go off with him.” A psychopathologist, attending a meeting of the American Psychopathological Association at the Park Sheraton Hotel, feared that this was just a guess. Others present noted that a study by Dr. Reginald Lourie of Children's Hospital, Washington, indicated in 1949 that 10 to 20 per cent of all children did "some act like rocking or rolling." The study went into detail on the stimulating effects of an intensi fied musical beat. Meanwhile, a parallel between rock 'n' roll and St. Vitus Dance| has been drawn by Dr. Joost A. M. Meerlo, associate in psychiatry at Columbia University, in a study just completed for publication.

Echo of Fourteenth Century

Dr. Meerlo described the "contagious epidemic of dance fury" that "swept Germany and spread to all of Europe" toward the end of the fourteenth century. It was called both St. Vitus Dance (or Chorea Major), he continued, with its victims breaking into dancing and being unable to stop. The same activity in Italy, he noted, was referred to as Tarantism and popularly related to a toxic bite by the hairy spider called tarantula. “The Children's Crusades and the tale of the Pied Piper of Hamelin," Dr. Meerlo went on, "remind us of these seductive, contagious dance furies."

Dr. Meerlo described his first view of rock 'n' roll this way: Young people were moved by a juke box to dance themselves "more and more into a prehistoric rhythmic trance until it had gone far beyond all the accepted versions of human dancing." 

Sweeping the country and even the world, the craze “demonstrated the violent mayhem long repressed everywhere on earth,' he asserted. " He also saw possible effects in political terms: "Why are rhythmical sounds and motions so especially contagious? A rhythmical call to the crowd easily foments mass ecstasy: 'Duce! Duce! Duce!" The call repeats itself into the infinite, and liberates the mind of all reasonable inhibitions -  as in drug addiction, a thousand years of civilization fall away in a moment."

Dr. Meerlo predicted that the craze would pass "as have all paroxysms of exciting music." But he said that the psychic phenomenon was important and dangerous. He concluded in this way: "Rock 'n' roll is a sign of depersonalization of the individual, of ecstatic veneration of mental decline and passivity.

"If we cannot stem the tide with its waves of rhythmic narcosis and of future waves of vicarious craze, we are preparing our own downfall in the midst of pandemic funeral dances.

"The dance craze is the infantile rage and outlet of our actual world. In this craze the suggestion of deprivation and dissatisfaction is stimulated and advertised day by day. In their automatic need for more and more, people are getting less and less."

"The awareness of this tragic contradiction in our epoch," Dr. Meerlo said, “must bring us back to a new assessment of what value and responsibility are."


Now if you look at some of Meerloo's many other books, the good doctor does seem persistently preoccupied with loss-of-mental-control under the influence of sinister powers, the de-invidualizing dark side of crowd psychology, etc:  

Patterns of Panic  (1950)

Delusion and Mass-delusion (1949)

The Rape of the Mind: the psychology of thought control, menticide, and brainwashing (1956).

Suicide and Mass Suicide (1962)

Intuition and the Evil Eye.: The natural history of a superstition (1971).

"Menticide"!



Now someone who lived through the Nazi conquest of their homeland (the Netherlands) might well have a particular and pained interest in irrationality: the fragility of the civilized mind in the face of a barbarian insurgency. 

And here's yet another book by Joost that makes the connection explicit:

Total War and the Human Mind: a psychologist's experiences in occupied Holland.

But, and here it gets interesting, somewhere between his remarks to the New York Times reporter Milton Bracker and his 1960 publication The Dance: From Ritual to Rock and Roll - Ballet to Ballroom,  Merloo's attitude to rock 'n' roll seems to have softened somewhat, succumbed to a fascination...























This is even more apparent in the book's other title: 

Dance Craze and Sacred Dance: an outlook on the eternal rock 'n' roll.

Far from some fly-by-night teen craze, rock'n'roll is "eternal" now - tapping into some undying capacity within humans to escape through trance.  Its precursors echo down through the ages to primeval man. And if the (almost certainly bow-tied) Dr Meerloo is still made a little uncomfortable by its latest manifestations, the "eternal" aspect seems to give it a certain dignity. 

As does the word "sacred". He seems to come round a bit to the idea that terpsichorean movements can be a form of worship. 

So naturally I had to get hold of the book - and found it easily, in the wonderful library of CalArts.

It's a beautiful looking book with loads of photographs of dancers from different cultures around the world - the photos take equal billing with the text, in fact - and there's some nice drawings too. The writing fuses the scholarly and poetic registers. In some places, the text breaks up into aphorisms and short bursts - it's as though exposure to all that syncopation has loosened Meerlo up as a writer and thinker. 















Shakers rattle and roll

But he's still a scholar and he's really done his research: just look at the contents pages: 

































The word "epidemics" in the section that includes rock 'n' roll  - "Modern Dance Epidemics" -  has the sniffy, "this is a social problem" tang of the New York Times quotes, which are probably taken from a scholarly article now I think about it. 





























But the actual entry on rock 'n ' roll is not as hostile or harshly judgmental - the tone perhaps is condescending, but trying to understand.




 



































In the course of the writing of this section, Meerlo moves from consternated to....  accepting. His researches into the history of ritual dance have shown him that youth is not in fact permanently damaged or corrupted by these epidemics of frenzy.... that after the bacchanal burns itself out, people return to their normal social selves and functions.  In tone it recalls Adorno on the jitterbug and the swing bands: 

"They call themselves 'jitter-bugs', bugs which carry out reflex movements, performers of their own ecstasy. Merely to be carried away by anything at all, to have something of their own, compensates for their impoverished and barren existence"

"Their ecstasy is without content.... The ecstasy takes possession of its object by its own compulsive character....  It has convulsive aspects reminescent of St Vitus's dance or the reflexes of mutilated animals. ... The same jitterbugs who behave as if they were electrified by syncopation, dance almost exclusively the good rhythmic parts" 


Except that in the Meerlo writing, after a stretch of what reads as condemnation, there is the sudden unexpected  concession of  the phrase "vitalizing regression". The thought that going-back (for Meerlo both to premodern, even pre-Christian ritual dance and to childhood's uncontrolled emotions) is healthy and invigorating, an outlet in a society that is otherwise a spiritual wasteland. Perhaps these crazes are benign forms of madness? "Is it all bad?", he thinks aloud?

In the next section, there is a similar movement - from equating, or seeing an affinity, between frenzied dancing and fascism, towards a viewpoint that sees liberation in ecstasy, a renewal of the spirit. 















































It's almost as though he's so attached to his earlier formulations - the bombastic rhetoric of civilization collapsing - that he wants to recycle  them (the precise phrasings as used in the NY Times piece) in the new text, even as he is being carried towards a different conclusion altogether: that ritual dance and Dionysian frenzy has a purgative effect that is societally healthy and that it can transport the individual to higher planes of (un)(self)consciousness.   A kind of elective and cathartically cleansing form of brainwashing, even. 



























What did I tell you? A bow tie!


Couldn't find much information about Meerlo out there... there's a Wiki that fills in his experience during the war....  and the ideas of his most famous book Rape of the Mind....  which came out during an era of great concern about brainwashing (as in The Manchurian Candidate etc) . Meerlo's experiences of Nazi occupation (he joined the resistance, adopted a Dutch-er and more Teutonic sounding first name, Joost, rather than the Jewish Abraham) are what gave him his abiding interest in collective madness and mass hypnosis




But I can't help wondering if the exposure to rock and roll and the research on all its ancestors did not have a subtly depraving effect on the good doctor, at least in the sense that it opened up his overly reason-bound mind to the possibility of other planes of consciousness. That there might be more to the human mind than the mind. 

For one of his later publications has a little bit of a late-period Colin Wilson flavour: 

Hidden communion: studies in the communication theory of telepathy




More from The Dance

x































"Walking is a rhythm too!"




I wonder what Dutchman Meerlo would have had to say about gabba and jumpstyle!